Skip To Main Content

Search Panel

Schools Menu

School Improvement Plan

What is a School Improvement Plan?

A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a strategic blueprint that schools use to enhance student learning and improve educational practices. It outlines specific goals for improvement, actions to achieve those goals, and methods for measuring progress.

Key Points of a SIP:

  • Goals: Clear objectives the school aims to achieve to enhance student outcomes.
  • Actions: Steps and strategies the school will implement to reach its goals, based on research and effective practices.
  • Monitoring: Regular review of progress with adjustments made to ensure the school stays on track toward its improvement objectives.
     

The purpose of a SIP is to provide a clear roadmap for schools to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly focusing on eliminating disparities and ensuring equitable opportunities for every student.

Every school in Washington State is required to have a School Improvement Plan.

Visit the Issaquah School District SIP website to learn more about SIPs.

District - School Improvement Plans

 

schematic of Cedar Trails

Cedar Trails Elementary School Improvement Plan

2024-2026

Strengths, Challenges, & Opportunities

Root Cause and Contributing Factors of Disproportionality

ISD recognizes that not all students benefit equally or achieve equitably within our district. Our outcome measures such as graduation rate, proficiency on assessments, and grades indicate that we are not achieving equitable results for students in identified ethnic and racial groups, students who are experiencing economic hardships, and students with disabilities. 

ISD is committed to disrupting patterns that result in inequitable outcomes. Global (across time and place) and local factors contribute to inequitable outcomes in our District, including the following: 

  • Institutional racism and ableism 
  • Impacts of economic hardship, including mobility or discontinuity of education 
  • Impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)  
  • Lack of consistent access to preventative and responsive services when experiencing ACEs 
  • Lack of consistent access to adequate supports designed to address basic and individual educational needs 
  • Lack of consistent access to high quality, inclusive, universally designed, and culturally responsive education 

NOTE: At Cedar Trails we have many students with ACES/trauma backgrounds.  We don’t have a specific data point for their individual childhood trauma but have heard their family stories.  We welcome any instruction around Trauma Informed Practices.  Our ultimate goal is to love them and give them a place where they feel they belong.  Tier 1 team digging into our UDL plan to highlight the ACES work around UDL. 

Reflection & Theory of Action

Backed by Data

Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timebound, Inclusive, Equity-focused goals aligned to the Academic Opportunities priority area of the ISD 3-year strategic plan, referencing data from the School Improvement Data Dashboard.

Data Workbook for Elementary School

Note:

  • The BIPOC Focus group includes students in the 4 federal race groups with ongoing disproportionate outcomes: Native American, African American, Hispanic, and Pacific Islander.
  • Students with Disabilities includes students with an Individual Education Plan, served in Special Services programs.
  • *OSPI has not released official attendance data as of the date of completion of this form, December 2024.

School-Based Action Plan

Programs and priorities listed below are being implemented, expanded or sustained during this 2-year SIP cycle at each of our elementary schools as part of the ISD Strategic Plan priorities and the establishment of Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS).  For this SIP cycle, schools will select 3 strategies, including the Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy, and at least one other from district-wide program or system listed, and describe their school’s implementation plan and strategies for monitoring impact. Be sure to relate actions plans to the 3 SIP goal areas.

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy. Launch new literacy curriculum that integrates science of reading strategies with comprehension strategies for all students to engage in close reading of grade level text. ISD Priority 2a,c

Select 1-2 of the following to describe in further detail:

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation of UDL as a framework of evidence-based, inclusive, and culturally responsive instructional practices for Tier 1. ISD Priority 2a

Tiered Teams. Implementation of a Tiered Team structure to examine integrated social-emotional and academic achievement data to adjust core instruction and/or intervention planning. ISD Priority 2b

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) / Social-Emotional Learning (SEL). Maintaining or enhancing school-wide systems of support and social emotional learning to increase belonging, well-being, and create the conditions for learning.   ISD Priority 1

Classroom-Based Intervention & Block Scheduling. Implementation of targeted supports, accommodations, and interventions (Tier 2) through classroom-based interventions, coordination of supplemental programs, in implementation of block scheduling. ISD Priority 2b

Inclusionary Practices. Collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and special education staff to provide a comprehensive continuum of inclusive services within the least restrictive educational environment to ensure that all students reach their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Multilingual Learners support. With the understanding that the whole day is an inclusive language learning experience for all students, collaboration and coordination of classroom teachers and multilingual learner specialists to deliver language acquisition strategies, ensure multilingual students have access to all instruction and learning, in  a language intensive learning environment so that they achieve their full potential.  ISD Priority 2b

Action Implementation Impact: Evidence/Monitoring

Implementation of Benchmark Advance Literacy

Training

  • All staff will participate in ISD district training
  • All teaching staff will meet on a determined schedule with the school implementation specialist
  • Training parents through a literacy event to learn about Benchmark Advance and how they can support literacy at home

Teaming

Recommendation: describe how and how often teams commit to discuss Benchmark Advance assessment data and implications for implementation centered on the following questions:

1. What do we want all students to know and be able to do?

2. How do we know if they learn it?

3. How are we responding when some students do not learn it?

4. How do we extend learning when students demonstrate mastery?

Integrity of Delivery

  • Use of implementation goals provided by Benchmark / Teaching & Learning Services
  • Collaboration in planning the literacy blocks

Resources Allocation

  • Implementation specialist (district)
  • Dedicated staff meeting time to training & collaboration
  • Commitment of team meeting time
  • Video recorded model lessons available
  • Tech training (optional) for learning about resources on Benchmark Universe
    • Just in time (optional) trainings for needs that arise (ex: assessment data analysis, intervention matching, co-planning)

Intended Impacts

  • Increase in reading decoding, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension

  • Increase in proficiency with grammar, writing structure, and effective communication of ideas in writing

  • Acceleration of achievement in key gap areas including phonics, overall reading, written expression

Key Data

  • i-Ready Phonics & Overall Reading
  • Achievement of stretch growth goals / accelerated growth for students scoring below standard in fall/prior spring.
  • Maintaining proficiency for students scoring at standard (level 3) in fall/prior spring.
  • Progress as monitored through embedded assessments:
    • Benchmark Performance Tasks

    • Benchmark week 2 assessments for each unit

    • RFS Assessments and Title/LAP progress monitoring

    • QPA/QSA and K Foundational Skills

Universal Design for Learning (UDL)

 

 

 

 

 

Action

  • SAEBRS: Use SAEBRS data in the classroom as a collective reflection data point.
  • Trail Tokens: Continue to use the school reward system to foster belonging and community here at Cedar Trails.
  • UDL Hub: Create a digital resource where teachers can access pictures from other Cedar Trails staff showing how they are integrating UDL concepts and Culturally Responsive Education strategies into their classrooms.  

Intended Impacts

  • Help teachers understand students at an emotional level with SAEBRS data, which in turn impacts how they learn in the classroom. This also give teachers visibility into the changes over the course of the school year.

Key Data

  • SAEBRS data

Additional School Improvement Plan Components

Family engagement

ISD Priority 4

Action

  • Curriculum Night: Include daycare so that more families can attend with the ease of on-site childcare for parents/guardians to attend the individual curriculum night(s)
  • Literacy Night: Include students to increase engagement
  • Bedtime Stories:
  • ML Engagement Night:
  • TLAP Engagement Night:
  • Conferences: Resource Fair outside of the Book Fair for families to discretely get access to resources
  • Parents on the Playground (RAD) ~ quarterly

Intended Impacts

  • Increase parent(s) knowledge of curriculum and to positively impact student learning/growth, and building our school-wide community

Key Data

  • Attendance at Events
  • Exit Tickets

Technology Integration

Accessibility Tools and Assistive Technology

  • Teachers use tools like speech-to-text and screen readers to help students with disabilities or language barriers to fully participate in learning, promoting inclusivity and equity. 

Multiple Ways to Engage in Learning

  • Students are provided with access to eBooks through Benchmark, Sora, and Learning Ally which offer multimodal ways to engage with text and provide access to grade level reading comprehension instruction.
  • Digital databases such as PebbleGo, Culturegrams, and World Book Kids offer safe ways for students to pursue research while providing embedded accessibility supports.
  • Students in grades 4 and 5 utilize Teams to support organization and strengthen executive functioning.

Multiple Ways to Demonstrate Learning/Knowledge

  • Creative tools such Seesaw, Book Creator, Canva, PowerPoint, and Sway to give students varied and more inclusive ways to express their learning and knowledge of content.

Intended Impacts 

  • Provide equitable access to learning by reducing barriers.
  • Increase student engagement and ownership in learning.
  • Embedded technology in UDL professional development delivered by Ignite teachers.

Key Data 

  • Learning platform/digital tool usage available through Clever. 
  • Track academic outcomes for students who are using technology as part of a tier 2 intervention. 

Resources

  • Tech TOSA collaboration support
  • Ignite teachers

School Improvement Team & Procedure Information

Principal

Tera Coyle

SIP Team Members

Laura Biller, Dean

Melissa Skone, Kindergarten

Sarah Fulghum, 1st Grade

Jenny Emsky, 2nd Grade

Jen Barth, 3rd Grade

Katie Wright, 4th Grade

CJ Jarreau, 5th Grade

Erin Mathias, OT/SpEd Rep

Reyna Yamamoto, TLAP (Reading & Math)/Intervention Rep

Brittany Hogan, PE Teacher/Specialist Rep

Megan Larson, Counselor/504 Coordinator

Aly Lamont, Ed. Tech TOSA

Agnes Jang, Implementation Specialist

Malorie Ulrich, Paraprofessional/Para Rep

 

Supervisor Review

November 13, 2024 Melinda Reynvaan

Site Council or PTSA Review

November 12, 2024

School Board Review

December 3, 2024